Why was the Framework developed?

Universities worldwide are engaged in a common drive to improve the quality of teaching. However, it is widely recognised that career advancement for academic staff rests primarily on their research profile, with teaching achievement often playing only a marginal role.

In recent decades, the higher education community has taken steps to address this imbalance and improve the status and reward of teaching in academic careers. The approach now offered by many of these universities is illustrated in the figure below. So, for example, promotion may be denied to academics whose teaching quality is below an acceptable threshold level (Point A), while, at the same time, advancement opportunities may be available to for exceptional contributions to teaching and learning (above point B).

However, these cases represent only a small proportion of academics engaged in university education and any progressive improvement in teaching achievement between these two extremes goes largely unrecognised and unrewarded by universities.

A major structural barrier to change appears to be the absence of a clear definition of teaching achievement at each stage of the career ladder and the inadequacy of the metrics used for evaluating the teaching contribution of academic staff.

Without the tools to assess and compare the quality of an academic’s educational contribution, the research-dominant culture within higher education is unlikely to change.

If the reward of university teaching is to improve, so too must the ways we define and evaluate it

Stacks Image 341

Model for how university teaching is often rewarded sector-wide, with the individual impact/achievement of an academic on the horizontal axis and the university's reward for that impact/achievement (via career progression) on the vertical axis.

The Career Framework for University Teaching provides universities with a template to define and evaluate teaching achievement at all stages of the academic career ladder. In particular, the Framework is designed to offer a clear set of definitions of, and criteria for, teaching achievement that are not bounded by disciplinary, institutional or national contexts, thus maximising the opportunities for achievements to be transferable between institutions.

FURTHER INFORMATION

Previous research
The Framework builds on a report published by the Royal Academy of Engineering in 2015 – Does teaching advance your academic career? – which looked at the perceptions of the recognition of teaching in academic promotion.
Stacks Image 249

Published: March 2015

Background information
Further information about the Career Framework for University Teaching is provided in the report published by the Royal Academy of Engineering in April 2018, which describes the drivers for the Framework's development.
Stacks Image 343

Published: April 2018

Previous research
The Framework builds on a report published by the Royal Academy of Engineering in 2015 – Does teaching advance your academic career? – which looked at the perceptions of the recognition of teaching in academic promotion.
Background information
Further information about the Career Framework for University Teaching is provided in the report published by the Royal Academy of Engineering in April 2018, which describes the drivers for the Framework's development.

Career Framework for University Teaching, 2024